INDRBT / ENGINEERING

INDRBT / Reading room

INDRBT · Industrial robot arm digital twin

Digital engineering model. Payload and repeatability are design targets. All ordinary guide reading, figures and PDFs work here. Links marked Source file lead to the public engineering repository.

Adapted for browser reading from the project’s illustrated documentation. Numeric results and engineering scope are unchanged. Reproduction notes are optional; the robot and board viewers run from the navigation above.

On this page

An original six-axis robot with parametric CAD, numerical kinematics and a reproducible pick-and-place simulation.

INDRBT actual CAD assembly

Digital only · v1.2.0 · DIGITAL SCOPE COMPLETE

Designed for robotics education and portfolio review. Every result is generated from source; no physical robot was built. Payload and repeatability remain design targets. The conceptual electronics include a routed PCB, manufacturing exports and native DRC; collision evidence is representative and sampled.

Explore the project

Repository home · CAD tour · Circuit and PCB tour · Engineering walkthrough · Documentation index

For a visual introduction, start with these guides. This source README contains the installation, reproduction commands and detailed evidence map.

See it move

Read the project purpose and original goals for the engineering question, intended demonstration and relationship between the subsystems.

Open the offline interactive CAD twin locally: orbit, change all six joints, adjust the gripper, select poses and play the recorded task. The single HTML file needs no server or internet. GitHub displays its source; download it to open it in a browser.

The CAD component selector isolates and frames any of the 54 actual parts. Use the component catalog to match part names, native objects, materials and STEP/STL files. The theory guide connects the model equations to evidence, and the electronics component guide explains references, selections and BOM population.

FK pick-and-place animation

The 9.24 s task follows MOVE J and MOVE L segments: approach, grasp, lift, transport, release and return home. CAD meshes and animation use the actual transform chain. The grasp is an ideal attachment; contact physics is not simulated.

Features and specifications

Item Value / evidence
Original geometry 54 valid BRep components; 6 STEP/STL assemblies
DOF / link lengths Six revolute joints / 320 mm upper arm + 280 mm forearm
Nominal reach 790 mm from shoulder; nominal straight-up TCP height 980 mm above base
Payload / repeatability 4 kg / ±0.1 mm TARGET, physically unverified
Mass basis 23.65 kg assumed; separate 19.908 kg CAD envelope sum with stated limitations
Gripper 90 mm opening; 200 N total force target; calculated screw torque 0.364 N·m
FK / IK / Jacobian Bounded numerical IK; 60 perturbed-seed pose trials
Motion / control Linear/cubic/quintic MOVE J, sampled MOVE L and saturated PID
Electronics Native 44-component KiCad interface; 0 ERC violations under enabled default rules; routed PCB/native DRC and connectivity evidence
Tests 91 tests; 0 failures; 0 errors

Run

Python 3.12+ is required. From the organized repository root, enter the source folder (skip the cd if already there):

cd 06_Complete_Project_Source
python -m venv .venv

Activate .venv (.venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1 on Windows; source .venv/bin/activate on Linux/macOS), then:

python -m pip install -e ".[cad,dev]"
python -m robotarm.demo --all
python scripts/run_validation.py

A fresh isolated environment validated the built wheel, its bundled configuration and a detached CLI demonstration. requirements-lock.txt records the dependency versions used for the generated results.

Command Generated evidence
python scripts/generate_cad.py STEP/STL, mesh manifest, CAD checks and dimension sheets
python -m robotarm.demo --workspace Workspace projections, 3D cloud and singularity plots
python -m robotarm.demo --trajectory MOVE J/MOVE L and interpolation comparisons
python -m robotarm.demo --pick-place Recorded joint data, TCP path and FK GIF
python -m robotarm.demo --control PID step/tracking curves and errors
python scripts/generate_results.py All numerical analyses/research and offline twin
python electronics/run_checks.py Native KiCad ERC, PCB DRC, schematic-board/net checks and manufacturing exports
python scripts/run_validation.py --full CAD/results regeneration followed by digital checks

KiCad 10 is needed for native ERC and PCB DRC. Its CLI is discovered from PATH or Windows installation records; electronics/run_checks.py also accepts --kicad-cli. The validation workflow accepts --skip-electronics when KiCad is unavailable and records electronics as NOT VERIFIED in that run. FreeCAD and Blender support independent inspection and rendering; see CAD methodology for their commands.

Architecture and CAD

System architecture

The single SI configuration drives the CAD/model/planner/analysis. Six Z-Y-Y-X-Y-X rotations orient hollow links, realistic clevis joints, access panels, cable bores, bearings and actuator envelopes. STEP assemblySource file, drawings, gripper render and CAD methodology support close inspection.

Generated results

Workspace cloud

The workspace plot comes from 6000 seeded FK samples. Its 1.9025 m³ convex hull fills inaccessible regions, so it represents an envelope rather than a collision-free reachable volume. Full extension and wrist alignment produce singularities. Kinematics defines the frames, equations and solver limitations.

Result Generated value Meaning
Maximum IK position residual 2.700e-11 m Numerical reconstruction only
Shoulder / elbow gravity holding torque 70.17 / 31.88 N·m Calculated with assumed masses and 4 kg payload
Task peak velocity / acceleration fractions 0.9517 / 0.9980 Fractions of configured limits at tested samples
PID tracking RMSE 0.006383 rad Independent inertia/damping plant simulation
Sampled CAD task clearance 75 poses / 6126 exact BRep checks; maximum prohibited overlap 0 mm³ All component pairs classified; continuous motion not verified

Five research experiments vary link ratio, payload, motion duration, PID gains and finger length. Mechanical calculations, control curves and complete KPIs keep assumed/target/calculated/simulated/verified claims separate.

Conceptual electronics

The native KiCad schematicSource file, PCBSource file and schematic PDF cover regulated logic power, encoder/limit inputs, external-drive commands and RS-485. All 44 assigned footprint files were found (43 stock and 1 project-local), and 118 exported pin assignments were verified. Native ERC reports 0 violations under the enabled default rules. The PCB verification retains actual DRC and schematic-board checks. Electronics scope documents fabrication outputs, rules, circuit calculations and assumptions. No physical hardware or manufacturing suitability is claimed.

Verification, report and limitations

Read the engineering report, validation matrix, executed check reportSource file, decision log and authentic journal.

This is a geometric digital twin with simplified educational control. Repeatability and payload ratings have no physical verification. Full CAD structural FEA, fatigue assessment, functional safety, coupled dynamics, frictional contact, manufacturing tolerances and real drive firmware are outside the implemented educational model. Workspace sampling and IK do not enforce collision avoidance. Collision checks are representative and sampled; manual slider poses may collide. The executed status is DIGITAL SCOPE COMPLETE for the documented digital scope.

Best portfolio material

  1. Hero CAD render — original overall mechanical design.
  2. Interactive CAD twin — model-driven motion and joint controls.
  3. Gripper render — guides, jaws and interchangeable tool interface.
  4. Engineering interface drawings — meaningful dimensions.
  5. Coordinate frames — explain the mathematics.
  6. Pick/place joint curves — motion constraints and derivatives.
  7. PID tracking — feedback model and measured simulation error.
  8. Payload experiment — connect engineering decisions to calculations.
  9. Native schematic PDF — real connectivity and ERC evidence.
  10. Engineering report — results, verification and honest limitations.

MIT-licensed project source. Third-party tool/library licenses remain their own; citation metadata is in CITATION.cff.